<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fasterfox is now compatible with Firefox 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/</link>
	<description>Blog Tips To Help You Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JohnTP</title>
		<link>http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/comment-page-1/#comment-30877</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 07:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/#comment-30877</guid>
		<description>Yes, I have enabled Fastererfox in Firefox 2 using that method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I have enabled Fastererfox in Firefox 2 using that method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menghua</title>
		<link>http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/comment-page-1/#comment-30873</link>
		<dc:creator>menghua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 06:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/#comment-30873</guid>
		<description>fastererfox is not compatible with firefox 2.0.. So should I use the method on enabling the extensions on your previous post?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fastererfox is not compatible with firefox 2.0.. So should I use the method on enabling the extensions on your previous post?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnTP</title>
		<link>http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/comment-page-1/#comment-30863</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 06:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/#comment-30863</guid>
		<description>menghua- I have not seen any noticible difference in the loading speed of web pages after installing Fasterfox. So I use &lt;b&gt;Fastererfox&lt;/b&gt; after a reader mentioned about it on comments in this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.johntp.com/2006/08/17/my-top-10-favorite-firefox-extensions/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ve used Fasterfox for quite a while now, and though it occasionally slows down new pages I visit, pages I regularly visit it speeds up surfing a LOT!

I’ve found a link for a tweaked version of Fasterfox, called rather cheesly Fastererfox. It allows you to grab web pages even faster with some new options which can be changed by the rather cool sounding “Thrash” option in the properties box.

http://rdc.untamed.co.uk/fastererfox/frame.htm 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

With Fastererfox I have noticed better performance. Let me know if you find any improvement after using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>menghua- I have not seen any noticible difference in the loading speed of web pages after installing Fasterfox. So I use <b>Fastererfox</b> after a reader mentioned about it on comments in this <a href="http://www.johntp.com/2006/08/17/my-top-10-favorite-firefox-extensions/" rel="nofollow">post</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>I’ve used Fasterfox for quite a while now, and though it occasionally slows down new pages I visit, pages I regularly visit it speeds up surfing a LOT!</p>
<p>I’ve found a link for a tweaked version of Fasterfox, called rather cheesly Fastererfox. It allows you to grab web pages even faster with some new options which can be changed by the rather cool sounding “Thrash” option in the properties box.</p>
<p><a href="http://rdc.untamed.co.uk/fastererfox/frame.htm" rel="nofollow">http://rdc.untamed.co.uk/fastererfox/frame.htm</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p>With Fastererfox I have noticed better performance. Let me know if you find any improvement after using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menghua</title>
		<link>http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/comment-page-1/#comment-30859</link>
		<dc:creator>menghua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 06:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/#comment-30859</guid>
		<description>sorry for double posting.. but I found that you posted that fasterfox does not help in increasing the loading speed in this post

http://www.johntp.com/2006/04/09/reducing-your-memory-usage-in-firefox/

Just wanted to know is it useful or not.. hehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for double posting.. but I found that you posted that fasterfox does not help in increasing the loading speed in this post</p>
<p><a href="http://www.johntp.com/2006/04/09/reducing-your-memory-usage-in-firefox/" rel="nofollow">http://www.johntp.com/2006/04/09/reducing-your-memory-usage-in-firefox/</a></p>
<p>Just wanted to know is it useful or not.. hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menghua</title>
		<link>http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/comment-page-1/#comment-30857</link>
		<dc:creator>menghua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 06:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/#comment-30857</guid>
		<description>Seriously, is fasterfox really useful? I find that a lot of negative feedbacks on this extensions that it doesn&#039;t really help much in increasing the speed on surfing.. can anyone clarify this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, is fasterfox really useful? I find that a lot of negative feedbacks on this extensions that it doesn&#8217;t really help much in increasing the speed on surfing.. can anyone clarify this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnTP</title>
		<link>http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/comment-page-1/#comment-30835</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/#comment-30835</guid>
		<description>Yes, I just hope all other incompatible extensions update to be compatible in Firefox 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I just hope all other incompatible extensions update to be compatible in Firefox 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shivaranjan</title>
		<link>http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/comment-page-1/#comment-30823</link>
		<dc:creator>Shivaranjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johntp.com/2006/11/01/fasterfox-is-now-compatible-with-firefox-20/#comment-30823</guid>
		<description>This is the one of the best of extensions available for Firefox, it is good news that now we can use this extension with Firefox 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the one of the best of extensions available for Firefox, it is good news that now we can use this extension with Firefox 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
