Comments on: What is wrong with my PageRank? http://www.johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/ Blog Tips To Help You Make Money Online Tue, 20 Apr 2010 04:21:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Google PageRank Update- Future PageRank Tools - JohnTP.com http://www.johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-20043 Google PageRank Update- Future PageRank Tools - JohnTP.com Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:11:49 +0000 http://johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/#comment-20043 [...] Google has started updating PageRank again and it looks like my PageRank problems are finally over. After checking my future pagerank, I found that both www.johntp.com and http://johntp.com has now got the same PageRank of 5 [...] [...] Google has started updating PageRank again and it looks like my PageRank problems are finally over. After checking my future pagerank, I found that both http://www.johntp.com and http://johntp.com has now got the same PageRank of 5 [...]

]]> By: JohnTP http://www.johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-19879 JohnTP Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:35:57 +0000 http://johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/#comment-19879 tony- Meta Tags had nothing to do with the PR problem. I removed them as they have less value now. I am probably facing this PR problem because Google is considering www.johntp.com and http://johntp.com as two different domains. This problem is temporary and should be fixed by next update or so. I earlier had 190 backlinks for www.johntp.com and 59 for http://johntp.com. With the latest Backlinks update, Google has added up both these and other backlinks and now I have 859 backlinks for www.johntp.com and 0 for http://johntp.com . This might mean that by next update my PageRank problems shall be over :) tony- Meta Tags had nothing to do with the PR problem. I removed them as they have less value now.

I am probably facing this PR problem because Google is considering http://www.johntp.com and http://johntp.com as two different domains. This problem is temporary and should be fixed by next update or so.

I earlier had 190 backlinks for http://www.johntp.com and 59 for http://johntp.com. With the latest Backlinks update, Google has added up both these and other backlinks and now I have 859 backlinks for http://www.johntp.com and 0 for http://johntp.com .

This might mean that by next update my PageRank problems shall be over :)

]]> By: CypherHackz http://www.johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-19302 CypherHackz Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:05:02 +0000 http://johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/#comment-19302 as i know, pr is based on how popular the page is. the more links back to the page, the more popular it is. as i know, pr is based on how popular the page is. the more links back to the page, the more popular it is.

]]> By: tony http://www.johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-19286 tony Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:01:50 +0000 http://johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/#comment-19286 But what has meta tags got to do with PR..? But what has meta tags got to do with PR..?

]]> By: WordPress Plugins needed to Optimize your Blog for Search Engines - JohnTP.com http://www.johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-15980 WordPress Plugins needed to Optimize your Blog for Search Engines - JohnTP.com Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:38:21 +0000 http://johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/#comment-15980 [...] This plugin is useful for people like me who have different PageRanks for their www and non www versions of their domain name. Example: PR 5 for http://johntp.com and PR 3 for www.johntp.com. The continuous plague of several pages being indexed using numerous variations of the same domain name has definately been experienced by most of us. In an attempt to remedy this extremely aggrivating issue; WWW-Redirect was born. Originating from the source of Matt’s no-www plug-in, www-redirect takes it a step or so further by allowing users to opt for different redirect settings. This plugin allows users to have more control over the uri in which their users access their blog. By doing so, you’re giving search engines and users a consistent link for accessing your content. [...] [...] This plugin is useful for people like me who have different PageRanks for their www and non www versions of their domain name. Example: PR 5 for http://johntp.com and PR 3 for http://www.johntp.com. The continuous plague of several pages being indexed using numerous variations of the same domain name has definately been experienced by most of us. In an attempt to remedy this extremely aggrivating issue; WWW-Redirect was born. Originating from the source of Matt’s no-www plug-in, www-redirect takes it a step or so further by allowing users to opt for different redirect settings. This plugin allows users to have more control over the uri in which their users access their blog. By doing so, you’re giving search engines and users a consistent link for accessing your content. [...]

]]> By: Google updating Backlinks at JohnTP’s Home http://www.johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-12800 Google updating Backlinks at JohnTP’s Home Thu, 31 Aug 2006 02:01:20 +0000 http://johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/#comment-12800 [...] Currently I have 190 backlinks to www.johntp.com and 59 to http://johntp.com as Google is considering both as different domains. I hope my backlinks are corrected this time Technorati Tags: backlinks, google, links, search engine [...] [...] Currently I have 190 backlinks to http://www.johntp.com and 59 to http://johntp.com as Google is considering both as different domains. I hope my backlinks are corrected this time Technorati Tags: backlinks, google, links, search engine [...]

]]> By: Will http://www.johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-9741 Will Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:46:16 +0000 http://johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/#comment-9741 We experienced a similar phenomenon. Our <a href="http://www.webstarcreations.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">homepage</a> had been a PR5 for many months and then the most recent PageRank update took it down to a PR3, but decided that one of our <a href="http://www.webstarcreations.co.uk/help/" rel="nofollow">deeper pages</a> was worth a PR6! We experienced a similar phenomenon. Our homepage had been a PR5 for many months and then the most recent PageRank update took it down to a PR3, but decided that one of our deeper pages was worth a PR6!

]]> By: Paul Stamatiou http://www.johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-7776 Paul Stamatiou Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:28:01 +0000 http://johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/#comment-7776 This is normal.. <a href="http://wisdump.com/webmastering/benefits-of-removing-www-from-your-url/" rel="nofollow">read this</a> This is normal.. read this

]]> By: Mohib http://www.johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-7540 Mohib Sun, 23 Jul 2006 04:17:54 +0000 http://johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/#comment-7540 Why not re-direct all your incoming traffic to http://johntp.com ? Why not re-direct all your incoming traffic to http://johntp.com ?

]]> By: John T P http://www.johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/comment-page-1/#comment-7531 John T P Sun, 23 Jul 2006 01:56:12 +0000 http://johntp.com/2006/07/17/what-is-wrong-with-my-pagerank/#comment-7531 Turbo Geek- This is the message I got when I visited www.gravatar.com <blockquote> We apologize for the inconvenience, this site is down for maintenance. Please check back in a few minutes. Thank You. </blockquote> I am sure this is just a temporary problem :-) Turbo Geek- This is the message I got when I visited http://www.gravatar.com

We apologize for the inconvenience, this site is down for maintenance. Please check back in a few minutes. Thank You.

I am sure this is just a temporary problem :-)

]]>