Comments on: The majority of web surfers use 1024×768 http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/ Blog Tips To Help You Make Money Online Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:11:00 +0530 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Alistair Macneil http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/comment-page-1/#comment-8676 Alistair Macneil Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:57:24 +0000 http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/#comment-8676 I'm also throwing off the 800 x 600 rule now as my analytics show I’m also throwing off the 800 x 600 rule now as my analytics show

]]> By: Nipon http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/comment-page-1/#comment-7704 Nipon Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:12:21 +0000 http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/#comment-7704 Many users in India still use 800x600. Some cyber cafes with old machines have that only :( Many users in India still use 800×600. Some cyber cafes with old machines have that only :(

]]> By: John T P http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/comment-page-1/#comment-6812 John T P Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:04:24 +0000 http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/#comment-6812 Pretty soon people will go for even more higher resolutions Pretty soon people will go for even more higher resolutions

]]> By: Jason Drohn http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/comment-page-1/#comment-6808 Jason Drohn Sun, 16 Jul 2006 22:29:47 +0000 http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/#comment-6808 This is great information. Quite a few of my sites have the same characteristics, people going to the higher resolutions. The good news is it places a lot more content 'above the fold' which is prime real estate in a browser. This is great information. Quite a few of my sites have the same characteristics, people going to the higher resolutions. The good news is it places a lot more content ‘above the fold’ which is prime real estate in a browser.

]]> By: Veron http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/comment-page-1/#comment-5021 Veron Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:26:01 +0000 http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/#comment-5021 Wonderful! For all my previous layouts I built each one to fit the 800x600 screen. It greatly limited the scope of my design and got real frustrating for a while. But for my latest site revamp I threw caution to the wind and designed it according to the 1024x768 screen. It looks a lot better now, both readability and aesthetics wise. Oh yeah my site visitors are largely 1024x768 screen users too! Wonderful! For all my previous layouts I built each one to fit the 800×600 screen. It greatly limited the scope of my design and got real frustrating for a while. But for my latest site revamp I threw caution to the wind and designed it according to the 1024×768 screen. It looks a lot better now, both readability and aesthetics wise.

Oh yeah my site visitors are largely 1024×768 screen users too!

]]> By: johntp http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/comment-page-1/#comment-4954 johntp Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:10:07 +0000 http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/#comment-4954 I think this is great news. But it also means that Web Designers may have to redesign their sites to make them display well on 1024x767 as they may have given importance to 800x600. I think this is great news. But it also means that Web Designers may have to redesign their sites to make them display well on 1024×767 as they may have given importance to 800×600.

]]> By: Thilak http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/comment-page-1/#comment-4953 Thilak Mon, 26 Jun 2006 13:04:17 +0000 http://www.johntp.com/2006/06/26/the-majority-of-web-surfers-use-1024x768/#comment-4953 Yes Dude !! Even I noticed this on my stats. Yes Dude !! Even I noticed this on my stats.

]]>